Metaphysical Premises And Types Of Liberal Ideology

The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:137-142 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of choosing the way for our country unavoidably brings us to a discussion of the problem of liberalism. At first glance, this should not be a problem since liberal principles underlie Western society and are the basis of the modern world order. But this opinion is not shared by all intellectuals in Russia. First is the specificity of the Russian mentality, social consciousness and social life. The idea of 'Russia's own way' is much referred to by various political movements of pronounced nationalist color, but we have to study this idea at its deepest level rather than oversimplify reality. Yet even most thinkers who are oriented to the West and have insisted on the adoption of Western values and standards have also strongly criticized European civilization. Secondly, liberalism does not have a simple meaning. It connotes a number of complex ideological systems transformed over time both in theory and in political practice. Therefore, it is important to analyze the metaphysical premises of liberal doctrines and systems. I will examine assessments of liberal ideas made by Russian religious philosophers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries such as P. Struve, N. Novgorodtsev, I. Iliin, and S. Frank who all considered liberalism primarily a metaphysical rather than a legal or political phenomenon, and interpreted it as an empirical manifestation of the deep nature of the human spiritual reality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Concept of ‘Metaphysical Liberalism’.Shuji Imamoto - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:120-125.
Political Liberalism and Public Reason.Onora O’Neill - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (3):411-428.
Justice and Restrain.João Cardoso Rosas - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
Man and mind in the philosophy of Boris N. Chicherin.Igor Yevlampiev - 2009 - Studies in East European Thought 61 (2-3):113-121.
Can Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach be a Foundation of Politically Liberal Theory of Justice?Yuko Kamishima - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:293-298.
Justice and Restrain.João Cardoso Rosas - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
Liberal Pluralism: A Reply to Talisse.William Galston - 2004 - Contemporary Political Theory 3 (2):140-147.
Liberal Democracy Vs. Neo-Liberal Globalization.Mislav Kukoc - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:399-406.
Comments on Liberalism.Minggui Zhang - 1997 - Philosophy and Culture 24 (11):1027-1040.
Legal Philosophies of Russian Liberalism. [REVIEW]James P. Scanlan - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (3):642-644.
Liberty Challenge or Dangers of Liberal Democracy.Dalia Eidukienė - 2011 - Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 17 (1):69-75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references