Linked bibliography for the SEP article "The Problem of Induction" by Leah Henderson

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

Achinstein, Peter, 2010, “The War on Induction: Whewell Takes on Newton and Mill (Norton Takes on Everyone)”, Philosophy of Science, 77(5): 728–739. (Scholar)
Armstrong, David M., 1983, What is a Law of Nature?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Baier, Annette C., 2009, A Progress of Sentiments, Harvard: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Bayes, Thomas, 1764, “An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53: 370–418. (Scholar)
Beauchamp, Tom L, and Alexander Rosenberg, 1981, Hume and the Problem of Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Bertrand, Joseph Louis Francois, 1888, Calcul des probabilites, Paris: Gauthier-Villars. (Scholar)
BonJour, Laurence, 1998, In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Borel, Emile, 1909, Elements de la theorie des probabilites, Paris: Herman et Fils. (Scholar)
Brown, M.B., 1987, “Review of The Rationality of Induction, D.C. Stove [1986]”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 8(1): 116–120. (Scholar)
Burks, Arthur W., 1953, “The Presupposition Theory of Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 20(3): 177–197. (Scholar)
–––, 1955, “On the Presuppositions of Induction”, Review of Metaphysics, 8(4): 574–611. (Scholar)
Campbell, Scott, 2001, “Fixing a Hole in the Ground of Induction”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79(4): 553–563. (Scholar)
Campbell, Scott, and James Franklin, 2004, “Randomness and the Justification of Induction”, Synthese, 138(1): 79–99. (Scholar)
Carnap, Rudolph, 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
Carroll, John W., 2016, “Laws of Nature”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/laws-of-nature/>. (Scholar)
Carroll, Lewis, 1895, “What the Tortoise said to Achilles”, Mind, 4(14): 278–280. (Scholar)
Cesa-Bianchi, Nicolo, and Gabor Lugosi, 2006, Prediction, Learning, and Games, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Chart, David, 2000, “Schulte and Goodman’s Riddle”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(1): 147–149. (Scholar)
Cleve, James van, 1984, “Reliability, Justification, and the Problem of Induction”, Midwest Studies In Philosophy: 555–567. (Scholar)
Cox, R. T., 1946, “Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation”, American Journal of Physics, 14: 1–10. (Scholar)
–––, 1961, The Algebra of Probable Inference, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Scholar)
de Finetti, Bruno, 1964, “Foresight: its logical laws, its subjective sources”, in H.E. Kyburg (ed.), Studies in subjective probability, New York: Wiley, pp. 93–158. (Scholar)
de Pierris, Graciela and Michael Friedman, 2013, “Kant and Hume on Causality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/kant-hume-causality/>. (Scholar)
Dretske, Fred I., 1977, “Laws of Nature”, Philosophy of Science, 44(2): 248–68. (Scholar)
Eckhardt, Arnold, 2010, “Can the Best-Alternative-Justification Solve Hume’s Problem? (On the limits of a promising approach)”, Philosophy of Science, 77(4): 584–593. (Scholar)
Feigl, Herbert, 1950, “De Principiis non disputandum”, in Max Black (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 119–56. (Scholar)
Foster, John, 2004, The Divine Lawmaker: Lectures on Induction, Laws of Nature and the Existence of God, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Garrett, Don, 2002, Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Ghosal, S., J. K. Ghosh, and A.W. van der Vaart, 2000, “Convergence rates of posterior distributions”, The Annals of Statistics, 28: 500–531. (Scholar)
Ghosal, S., J. Lember, and A. W. van der Vaart, 2008, “Non-parametric Bayesian model selection and averaging”, Electronic Journal of Statistics, 2: 63–89. (Scholar)
Giaquinto, Marcus, 1987, “Review of The Rationality of Induction, D.C. Stove [1986]”, Philosophy of Science, 54(4): 612–615. (Scholar)
Goodman, Nelson, 1955, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Hacking, Ian, 1975, The Emergence of Probability: a Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Hájek, Alan, 2011, “Interpretations of Probability”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/probability-interpret/>. (Scholar)
Harman, Gilbert, 1968, “Enumerative Induction as Inference to the Best Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy, 65(18): 529–533. (Scholar)
Henderson, Leah, 2014, “Bayesianism and Inference to the Best Explanation”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65(4): 687–715. (Scholar)
Howson, Colin, 2000, Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2011, “No Answer to Hume”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(3): 279–284. (Scholar)
Huemer, Michael, 2009, “Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(2): 345–375. (Scholar)
[T] Hume, David, 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Cited by book.part.section.paragraph.) (Scholar)
[E] –––, 1748, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Cited by section.part.paragraph.) (Scholar)
Jackson, Alexander, 2019, “How to solve Hume’s problem of induction”, Episteme 16: 157–174. (Scholar)
Jeffreys, Harold, 1939, Theory of Probability, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Johnson, William Ernest, 1921, Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1932, “Probability: the Deductive and Inductive Problems”, Mind, 49(164): 409–423. (Scholar)
Kant, Immanuel, 1781, Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Translated as Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, A., (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
–––, 1783, Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. Translated as Prologomena to Any Future Metaphysics, James W. Ellington (trans.), Indianapolis: Hackett publishing, 2002. (Scholar)
Kelly, Kevin T., 1996, The Logic of Reliable Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2007, “A new solution to the puzzle of simplicity”, Philosophy of Science, 74: 561–573.
Kelly, Thomas, 2010, “Hume, Norton and induction without rules”, Philosophy of Science, 77: 754–764. (Scholar)
Keynes, John Maynard, 1921, A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
Lange, Marc, 2011, “Hume and the Problem of induction”, in Dov Gabbay, Stephan Hartmann and John Woods (eds.), Inductive Logic, (Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 10), Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 43–92. (Scholar)
Laplace, Pierre-Simon, 1814, Essai philosophique sur les probabilités, Paris. Translated in 1902 from the sixth French edition as A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, by Frederick Wilson Truscott and Frederick Lincoln Emory, New York: John Wiley and Sons. Retranslated in 1995 from the fifth French edition (1825) as Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, by Andrew I. Dale, 1995, New York: Springer-Verlag. (Scholar)
Maher, Patrick, 1996, “The Hole in the Ground of Induction”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(3): 423–432. (Scholar)
Maxwell, Nicholas, 2017, Understanding Scientific Progress: Aim-Oriented Empiricism, St. Paul: Paragon House. (Scholar)
Mitchell, Tom, 1997, Machine Learning: McGraw-Hill. (Scholar)
Morris, William E., and Charlotte R. Brown, 2014 [2017], “David Hume”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/hume/>. (Scholar)
Norton, John D., 2003, “A Material Theory of Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 70(4): 647–670. (Scholar)
–––, 2010, “There are no universal rules for induction”, Philosophy of Science, 77: 765–777. (Scholar)
–––, 2021, The Material Theory of Induction: BSPS Open/University of Calgary Press. (Scholar)
Okasha, Samir, 2001, “What did Hume Really Show about Induction?”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 51(204): 307–327. (Scholar)
–––, 2005a, “Bayesianism and the Traditional Problem of Induction”, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 5(14): 181–194. (Scholar)
–––, 2005b, “Does Hume’s Argument against Induction Rest on a Quantifier-Shift Fallacy?”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105: 237–255. (Scholar)
Owen, David, 1999, Hume’s Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Papineau, David, 1992, “Reliabilism, Induction and Scepticism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 42(166): 1–20. (Scholar)
Popper, Karl, 1935 [1959], Logik der Forschung, Wien: J. Springer. Translated by Popper as The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson, 1959. (Scholar)
Ramsey, Frank P., 1926, “Truth and Probability”, in R.B. Braithwaite (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, London: Routledge and Kegan-Paul Ltd., pp. 156–98. (Scholar)
Reichenbach, Hans, 1949, The Theory of Probability, Berkeley: University of California Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1938 [2006], Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Page numbers from the 2006 edition, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. (Scholar)
Romeijn, Jan-Willem, 2004, “Hypotheses and Inductive Predictions”, Synthese, 141(3): 333–364. (Scholar)
Russell, Bertrand, 1946, A History of Western Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. (Scholar)
–––, 1948, Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, New York: Simon and Schuster. (Scholar)
Salmon, Wesley C., 1963, “On Vindicating Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 30(3): 252–261. (Scholar)
–––, 1966, The Foundations of Scientific Inference, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. (Scholar)
–––, 1981, “Rational Prediction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32(2): 115–125. (Scholar)
Salmon, Wesley C., 1953, “The Uniformity of Nature”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(1): 39–48. (Scholar)
Savage, Leonard J, 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Dover Publications. (Scholar)
Schulte, Oliver, 1999, “Means-Ends Epistemology”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50(1): 1–31. (Scholar)
–––, 2000, “What to believe and what to take seriously: a reply to David Chart concerning the riddle of induction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51: 151–153. (Scholar)
–––, 2017 [2018], “Formal Learning Theory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/learning-formal/>. (Scholar)
Schurz, Gerhard, 2008, “The Meta-inductivist’s Winning Strategy in the Prediction Game: A New Approach to Hume’s Problem”, Philosophy of Science, 75(3): 278–305. (Scholar)
–––, 2017, “Optimality Justifications: New Foundations for Foundation-Oriented Epistemology”, Synthese, 73:1–23. (Scholar)
–––, 2019, Hume’s Problem Solved: the Optimality of Meta-induction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
–––, 2021a, “Meta-induction over unboundedly many prediction methods: a reply to Arnold and Sterkenburg”, Philosophy of Science, 88: 320–340. (Scholar)
–––, 2021b, “The No Free Lunch Theorem: bad news for (White’s account of) the problem of induction”, Episteme, 18: 31–45. (Scholar)
Schurz, Gerhard, and Paul Thorn, 2020, “The material theory of object-induction and the universal optimality of meta-induction: two complementary accounts”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 82: 99–93. (Scholar)
Skyrms, Brian 2000, Choice and Chance: an introduction to inductive logic, Wadsworth. (Scholar)
–––, 2012, From Zeno to Arbitrage: Essays on Quantity, Coherence and Induction, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
Sober, Elliott, 1988, Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
Steel, Daniel, 2010, “What If the Principle of Induction Is Normative? Formal Learning Theory and Hume’s Problem”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 24(2): 171–185. (Scholar)
Sterkenburg, Tom, 2019, “The meta-inductive justification of induction: the pool of strategies”, Philosophy of Science, 86: 981–992. (Scholar)
–––, 2020, “The meta-inductive justification of induction”, Episteme, 17: 519–541. (Scholar)
–––, forthcoming, “Explaining the success of induction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, https://doi.org/10.1086/717068. (Scholar)
Sterkenburg, Tom and Peter Grünwald, 2021, “The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learning”, Synthese, 199: 9979–10015. (Scholar)
Stove, David C., 1986, The Rationality of Induction, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
Strawson, Peter Frederick, 1952, Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen. (Scholar)
Tooley, Michael, 1977, “The Nature of Laws”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7(4): 667–698. (Scholar)
White, Roger, 2015, “The problem of the problem of induction”, Episteme, 12: 275–290. (Scholar)
Will, Frederick L., 1948, “Donald Williams’ Theory of Induction”, Philosophical Review, 57(3): 231–247. (Scholar)
Williams, Donald C., 1947, The Ground of Induction, Harvard: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1953, Philosophical Investigations, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. (Scholar)
Wolpert, D. H., 1997, “No free lunch theorems for optimization”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1: 67–82. (Scholar)
–––, 1992, “On the connecton between in-sample testing and generalization error”, Complex Systems, 6: 47–94. (Scholar)
–––, 1996, “The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms”, Neural Computation 8: 1341–1390. (Scholar)
Worrall, John, 2010, “For Universal Rules, Against Induction”, Philosophy of Science, 77(5): 740–53. (Scholar)
Wright, Crispin, 2004, “Wittgensteinian Certainties”, in Denis McManus (ed.), Wittgenstein and Scepticism, London: Routledge, pp. 22–55. (Scholar)
Zabell, Sandy L., 1988, “Symmetry and Its Discontents”, in Brian Skyrms (ed.), Causation, Chance and Credence, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 155–190. (Scholar)
–––, 1989, “The Rule of Succession”, Erkenntnis, 31(2–3): 283–321. (Scholar)

Generated Sun Mar 26 17:07:13 2023

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...