- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Cognitive Equivalence, Complementarity, and Evolution
In Frederick Adams & Kenneth Aizawa (eds.), The Bounds of Cognition. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 133–151 (2008)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Cognitive Equivalence The Complementarity Argument Evolutionary Arguments Conclusion: The Importance of the Mark of the Cognitive.Author's Profile
cognitive equivalence, complementarity and evolution complementarity arguments ‐ what is traditionally conceived to be cognitive processing, unlike what is found in external biological and physical objects cognitive equivalence argument ‐ quasi‐syllogism, striking as a logical or conceptual truth revisiting, reading Inga–Otto ‐ exploring Inga–Otto example, putative case of cognitive equivalence primacy and recency effects ‐ not the only points of difference between Inga's memory and Otto's “memory” current cognitive psychology, issue of correct grain of analysis ‐ appealing to that grain computer game Tetris ‐ example of cognitive equivalence between the intracranial and the transcranial advocates of extended cognition ‐ cognitive processes and their extension into these tools Clark and Sutton's use of complementarity ‐ arguing for existence of extended cognitive system
My notes
Similar books and articles
What Matters for Moral Status: Behavioral or Cognitive Equivalence?John Danaher - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (3):472-478.
Embraining Culture: Leaky Minds and Spongy Brains.Julian Kiverstein & Mirko Farina - 2011 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (2).
The relation between science and theology: The case for complementarity revisited.K. Helmut Reich - 1990 - Zygon 25 (4):369-390.
Complementarity of Mental Observables.Irina Basieva & Andrei Khrennikov - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):74-78.
From things to thinking: Cognitive archaeology.Adrian Currie & Anton Killin - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (2):263-279.
On the Character of Quantum Law: Complementarity, Entanglement, and Information.Arkady Plotnitsky - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (8):1115-1154.
When does complementarity support pluralism about schools of economic thought?Teemu Lari - 2021 - Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (3):322-335.
Part 1: Theoretical equivalence in physics.James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):e12592.
Abductive Equivalence in First-order Logic.Katsumi Inoue & Chiaki Sakama - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):333-346.
New natural law theory and foundational sexual ethical principles: A critique and a proposal.Michael G. Lawler Todd A. Salzman - 2006 - Heythrop Journal 47 (2):182-205.
Part 2: Theoretical equivalence in physics.James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):e12591.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
5 (#1,540,694)
6 months
4 (#790,347)
2023-06-15
Downloads
5 (#1,540,694)
6 months
4 (#790,347)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-9vkzx uwo