Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):369-382 (2004)
|Abstract||Governing boards utilize executive compensation contracts in an attempt to align executive actions with corporate goals. The objective is to ensure that executive performance provides value to the organization in terms of successful outcomes. A key performance criteria typically specified in CEO compensation contracts is earnings targets. However, using earnings as a performance evaluation may be problematic because some firms exhibit robust and sustained earnings over time (high earnings persistence), and other firms, such as high growth oriented firms, exhibit weak or sometimes negative earnings over time (low earnings persistence). Our study reveals that the effect of high earnings persistence results in firms that focus more heavily on cash compensation (salary and bonus) rather than on equity compensation (stock options, etc.) to compensate executive performance. Additionally, for firms characterized by low earnings persistence, our study indicates that cash flows from operations act as a supplementary performance measure to accounting earnings, and become increasingly important as a means to justify executive cash compensation|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Julian Friedland (2010). A Fair Wage? Capping Executive Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:129-139.
Gopal V. Krishnan & Linda M. Parsons (2008). Getting to the Bottom Line: An Exploration of Gender and Earnings Quality. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):65 - 76.
James A. Brander (2006). The Effect of Ethical Fund Portfolio Inclusion on Executive Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (4):317 - 329.
Ella Mae Matsumura & Jae Yong Shin (2005). Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation: Intended and Unintended Consequences. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):101 - 113.
Lee M. Dunham & Ken Washer (2012). The Ethics of Hedging by Executives. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):157-164.
Lois Schafer Mahoney & Linda Thorn (2006). An Examination of the Structure of Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Canadian Investigation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):149 - 162.
Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Gerald J. Lobo & Emad Mohammad (2009). Are Stock Options Grants to Ceos of Stagnant Firms Fair and Justified? Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1):137 - 155.
Hoje Jo & Yongtae Kim (2008). Ethics and Disclosure: A Study of the Financial Performance of Firms in the Seasoned Equity Offerings Market. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4):855 - 878.
John Dobson (2011). A Moral and Economic Defense of Executive Compensation. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1-2):59-70.
Obeua S. Persons (2006). The Effects of Fraud and Lawsuit Revelation on U.S. Executive Turnover and Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (4):405 - 419.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,469 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?