Randomization Should Be Disclosed to Potential Research Subjects

&
American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):35-37 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2013.849307

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Cluster randomization and political philosophy.Eric Chwang - 2011 - Bioethics 26 (9):476-484.
Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
A Bayesian Argument in Favor of Randomization.Zeno G. Swijtink - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:159-168.
The Ethical Analysis of Risks and Potential Benefits in Human Subjects Research: History, Theory, and Implications for U.S. Regulation.Charles Weijer - unknown
Terminating clinical trials without sufficient subjects.Lianne Damen, Frans van Agt, Theo de Boo & Frans Huysmans - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):413-416.
Informed consent, exploitation and whether it is possible to conduct human subjects research without either one.Dave Wendler - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (4):310–339.
Intrinsic Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: A Need for Disclosure.Sharmon Sollitto, Sharona Hoffman, Maxwell J. Mehlman, Robert J. Lederman, Stuart J. Youngner & Michael M. Lederman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):83-91.
Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know?Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
Developing model language for disclosing financial interests to potential clinical research participants.K. P. Weinfurt, J. S. Allsbrook, J. Y. Friedman, M. A. Dinan, M. A. Hall, K. A. Schulman & J. Sugarman - 2006 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (1):1-5.
Research ethics in internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. [REVIEW]Joseph B. Walther - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):205-216.
Both Sides of the Coin: Randomization from the Perspectives of Physician-Investigators and Patient-Subjects.Eric D. Kodish, Kathleen A. Kassimatis & Tsiao Yi Yap - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (5):380-386.
Ethical Review of Research on Human Subjects at Unilever: Reflections on Governance.Mark Sheehan, Vernon Marti & Tony Roberts - 2013 - Bioethics 28 (6):284-292.
Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects.Lisa Eckenwiler - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):37-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
16 (#907,028)

6 months
7 (#430,392)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ariella Binik
McMaster University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1986 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
The Ethical Analysis of Risk.Charles Weijer - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):344-361.
The Ethical Analysis of Risk.Charles Weijer - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):344-361.

View all 7 references / Add more references