Defending the substance view against its critics

The New Bioethics 28 (1):54-67 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, the substance view of persons has been heavily criticized for the counterintuitive conclusions it seems to imply in scenarios such as embryo rescue cases and embryo loss. These criticisms...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza’s Two Views of Substance.Frank Lucash - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (3):537-555.
Descartes on Corporeal Substances.Ezequiel Zerbudis - 2015 - Quaderns de Filosofia 2 (2).
The Substance View: A Critique.Rob Lovering - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (5):263-70.
The Substance View: A Critique (Part 3).Rob Lovering - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):305-312.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-22

Downloads
58 (#274,598)

6 months
15 (#163,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce P. Blackshaw
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

What do philosophers believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Ethics and Intuitions.Peter Singer - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):331-352.

View all 32 references / Add more references