Electronic monitoring and privacy issues in business-marketing: The ethics of the doubleclick experience [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 35 (4):243 - 254 (2002)
The paper examines the ethics of electronic monitoring for advertising purposes and the implications for Internet user privacy using as a backdrop DoubleClick Incs recent controversy over matching previously anonymous user profiles with personally identifiable information. It explores various ethical theories that are applicable to understand privacy issues in electronic monitoring. It is argued that, despite the fact that electronic monitoring always constitutes an invasion of privacy, it can still be ethically justified on both Utilitarian and Kantian grounds. From a Utilitarian perspective the emphasis must be on minimizing potential harms. From a Kantian perspective the emphasis must be on giving users complete information so that they can make informed decisions as to whether they are willing to be monitored. Considering the Internet advertising industrys current actions, computer users and government regulators would be well advised, both practically and ethically, to move to a user control model in electronic monitoring.
|Keywords||business marketing computer ethics cookies electronic monitoring privacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kirsten E. Martin (2012). Diminished or Just Different? A Factorial Vignette Study of Privacy as a Social Contract. Journal of Business Ethics 111 (4):519-539.
Similar books and articles
Edward J. Ottensmeyer & Mark A. Heroux (1991). Ethics, Public Policy, and Managing Advanced Technologies: The Case of Electronic Surveillance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (7):519 - 526.
Adam D. Moore (2000). Employee Monitoring and Computer Technology. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):697-709.
Thomas J. Hodson, Fred Englander & Valerie Englander (1999). Ethical, Legal and Economic Aspects of Employer Monitoring of Employee Electronic Mail. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):99 - 108.
Richard S. Rosenberg (1999). The Workplace on the Verge of the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (1):3 - 14.
Stephen Coleman (2006). E-Mail, Terrorism, and the Right to Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (1):17-27.
William P. Smith & Filiz Tabak (2005). Who Do You Trust? Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:33-37.
James J. Cappel (1995). A Study of Individuals' Ethical Beliefs and Perceptions of Electronic Mail Privacy. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (10):819 - 827.
Seumas Miller & John Weckert (2000). Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
G. Stoney Alder (1998). Ethical Issues in Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Consideration of Deontological and Teleological Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (7):729-743.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #26,049 of 1,696,508 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #69,748 of 1,696,508 )
How can I increase my downloads?