What's wrong with tonk(?)
Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (2):217 - 226 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlan Strudler (2010). The Distinctive Wrong in Lying. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2).
Ori J. Herstein (2012). Defending the Right To Do Wrong. Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
Charles Fried (1978). Right and Wrong. Harvard University Press.
Eduardo Rivera-López (2006). Can There Be Full Excuses for Morally Wrong Actions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):124-142.
Eduardo Rivera-lópez (2006). Can There Be Full Excuses for Morally Wrong Actions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):124–142.
Christopher Steinsvold (2010). Being Wrong: Logics for False Belief. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):245-253.
Steven Wagner (1981). Tonk. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (4):289-300.
Nuel Belnap (1962). Tonk, Plonk and Plink. Analysis 22 (6):130-134.
By Neil Tennant (2005). Rule-Circularity and the Justification of Deduction. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):625–648.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads41 ( #27,810 of 548,979 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,979 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
