Intelligent agents and liability: Is it a doctrinal problem or merely a problem of explanation? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (1):103-121 (2010)
The question of liability in the case of using intelligent agents is far from simple, and cannot sufficiently be answered by deeming the human user as being automatically responsible for all actions and mistakes of his agent. Therefore, this paper is specifically concerned with the significant difficulties which might arise in this regard especially if the technology behind software agents evolves, or is commonly used on a larger scale. Furthermore, this paper contemplates whether or not it is possible to share the responsibility with these agents and what are the main objections surrounding the assumption of considering such agents as responsible entities. This paper, however, is not intended to provide the final answer to all questions and challenges in this regard, but to identify the main components, and provide some perspectives on how to deal with such issue.
|Keywords||Intelligent agent Liability Decision making Foreseeability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
William Bechtel (1985). Attributing Responsibility to Computer Systems1,. Metaphilosophy 16 (4):296-306.
Daniel C. Dennett (1984). I Could Not Have Done Otherwise--So What? Journal of Philosophy 81 (10):553-565.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matt King (2009). The Problem with Negligence. Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):577-595.
John L. Pollock (1999). Rational Cognition in Oscar. Agent Theories.
Vincent C. Müller (2007). Is There a Future for AI Without Representation? Minds and Machines 17 (1):101-115.
Joseph Raz (2010). Responsibility and the Negligence Standard. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):1-18.
Mr Sahon Bhattacharyya, Intelligent Agents in Military, Defense and Warfare: Ethical Issues and Concerns.
Alexander Serenko & Brian Detlor (2004). Intelligent Agents as Innovations. AI and Society 18 (4):364-381.
Steffen Wettig & Eberhard Zehender (2004). A Legal Analysis of Human and Electronic Agents. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):111-135.
Emad Abdel Rahim Dahiyat (2007). Intelligent Agents and Contracts: Is a Conceptual Rethink Imperative? [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (4):375-390.
Added to index2010-03-13
Total downloads13 ( #125,610 of 1,099,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #189,854 of 1,099,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?