The methodological status of grammatical argumentation
Philosophia 3 (2-3):351-364 (1973)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBart Verheij (2003). Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
Nicholas Joll (2009). Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Theme, Point, and Methodological Status. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):233–53.
Guy Longworth (2007). Conflicting Grammatical Appearances. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):403-426.
I. Koskinen (2011). Seemingly Similar Beliefs: A Case Study on Relativistic Research Practices. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):84-110.
Ana Nettel & Georges Roque (2012). Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation. Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.
Guy Longworth (2007). Conflicting Grammatical Appearances. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):403-426.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque (2010). Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.
Michael H. Kelly (1999). Indirect Representation of Grammatical Class at the Lexeme Level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):49-50.
Margareth Sandvik (1997). Reconstructing Interactive Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation 11 (4):419-434.
Barbara Schmitz (2006). Grammatical Propositions. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):227-249.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
