Considering Whether the Dismissal of Vaccine-Refusing Families Is Fair to Other Clinicians

JAMA Pediatrics 172 (6):515-516 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) clinical report states that it is an acceptable option for pediatric care clinicians to dismiss families who refuse vaccines. This is a clear shift in guidance from the AAP, which previously advised clinicians to “endeavor not to discharge” patients solely because of parental vaccine refusal. While this new policy might be interpreted as encouraging or recommending dismissal of vaccine-refusing families, it instead expresses tolerance for diverse professional approaches. This is unlike the earlier guidance, which promoted a unified response to vaccine refusal. In fact, the resolution (which was presented at the AAP’s Annual Leadership Forum) that led to this clinical report also calls on the AAP “to continue to support pediatricians who continue to provide health care to children of parents who refuse to immunize their children.” However, the shift toward embracing dismissal as an acceptable response to vaccine refusal may erode professional solidarity. Pediatricians are clearly divided on this question; most do not dismiss vaccine-refusing families. By declaring that dismissal is an acceptable option, the AAP has sanctioned a practice that may be unfair to the many clinicians who do not dismiss these families. Clinicians who adopt a policy of dismissal toward families who refuse vaccines might impose burdens on colleagues who remain willing to offer care to those families, and their actions might show insufficient commitment to the efforts of their profession to promote health for all children.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Pediatrician's Dilemma: Refusing the Refusers of Infant Vaccines.Stan L. Block - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (3):648-653.
Ethically compromised vaccines in Australia.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (3):1.
On Immunity: An Inoculation by Eula Biss.Michael Yudell - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (4):1-3.
Competing Epistemic Spaces.Mark Navin - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (2):241-264.
Hiv preventive vaccine research: Selected ethical issues.Christine Grady - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):595-612.
Resisting Moral Permissiveness about Vaccine Refusal.Mark Navin - 2013 - Public Affairs Quarterly 27 (1):69-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-02

Downloads
41 (#385,395)

6 months
10 (#261,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael J. Deem
University of Pittsburgh
Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University

References found in this work

The Pediatrician's Dilemma: Refusing the Refusers of Infant Vaccines.Stan L. Block - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (3):648-653.

Add more references