The Nature of Substance

Philosophy 5 (19):392-407 (1930)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The classical and scholastic view of things was of neutral substance to which qualities were attached as substantial adjuncts. Qualities could apparently not be conceived of otherwise than as entities: blueness, hardness, pliability, toughness, translucency, and so on. Noun substantives were the part of speech by which they could most properly be referred to. The use of adjectives did not imply that these qualities were not substantival entities, but emphasized their subordinateness to the thing itself, and were useful in giving pliability, lightness, and elegance to speech. But qualities could not be conceived of otherwise than as something superadded to the neutral substance which carried them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Substance.G. A. C. de Moubradey - 1930 - Philosophy 5 (19):392-.
The Nature of Substance.Ian J. Thompson - 1988 - Cogito 2 (2):17-19.
An examination of the bundle-theory of substance.Kwame Gyekye - 1973 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1):51-61.
Descartes's case for dualism.Marleen Rozemond - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1):29-63.
Spinoza’s Two Views of Substance.Frank Lucash - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (3):537-555.
Substance: Its Nature and Existence.Joshua Hoffman & Gary Rosenkrantz - 1996 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Gary S. Rosenkrantz.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
2 (#1,806,327)

6 months
1 (#1,475,085)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references