The Riddle of Nostradamus: A Critical Dialogue

(1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nostradamus (1503-66) is one of the most controversial writers of the Renaissance and one of the most widely read. Whatever his other accomplishments, he is best remembered as an enigmatic seer, the man who could foretell events, though he could not specify when in the future they would occur. Modern readers tend to view Nostradamus either as a relic from a superstitious age or as an inspired visionary. In this book Georges Dumezil, renowned scholar of myth and religion, takes Nostradamus seriously in order to examine, for once, what happens if he is taken very seriously indeed. Can one foresee the future, Dumezil asks, and fail to understand it?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

metaphysics In The Thirties And Why Should Anyone Care Now?Richard Creath - 2014 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 17:67-76.
Les Prophéties de Nostradamus dévoilées. — Lettre à Henry II. De Fontbrune & Georges Barbarin - 1938 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 126 (9):238-239.
The Complete Prophecies of Nostradamus. [REVIEW]P. R. - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (4):666-666.
On Plato's Use of Socrates as a Character in his Dialogues.Hallvard Fossheim - 2008 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 5:239-263.
Protagoras. Plato - 1956 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by C. C. W. Taylor.
Virtue, Practice, and Perplexity in Plato's Meno.William Wians - 2013 - Plato Journal (Plato 12 (2012)).

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
7 (#1,389,208)

6 months
3 (#980,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references