Against Definitions
In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. The Mit Press (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesR. G. Swinburne (1975). Analyticity, Necessity and Apriority. Mind 84 (334):225-243.
Charlotte Werndl (2009). Justifying Definitions in Mathematics—Going Beyond Lakatos. Philosophia Mathematica 17 (3):313-340.
Kristina Meshelski (2011). Two Kinds of Definition in Spinoza's Ethics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):201-218.
David Pitt (1999). In Defense of Definitions. Philosophical Psychology 12 (2):139-156.
Newton C. A. da Costa & Jean-Yves Béziau (1998). Définition, Théorie des Objets et Paraconsistance (Definition, Objects' Theory and Paraconsistance). Theoria 13 (2):367-379.
Newton C. A. Costdaa & Jean-Yves Béziau (1998). Définition, Théorie Des Objets Et Paraconsistance (Definition, Objects' Theory and Paraconsistance). Theoria 13 (2):367-379.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-08-17Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
