Arnauld’s Theory of Ideative Knowledge

The Monist 71 (4):543-559 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Arnauld’s view, a fruitful clarification of the nature of knowledge is possible if only one pays close attention to “ce qui se passe en nous,” in such a fashion “de n’y rien mêler dont nous ne soyons certains.” In support of his position, he cites not only Descartes’ testimony but also that of St. Augustine. Consequently, he treats—first of all—of the things that any one can know about his own soul upon consulting with himself with a little attention, and by so doing Arnauld shows once again his faithfulness to the spirit of Cartesianism. Yet he does more, for he is among the first thinkers fully to appreciate the value of a truly descriptive method in philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Occasionalism in the Malebranche-Arnauld Debate.Andrew Gerard Black - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Essence and Possibility in the Leibniz‐Arnauld Correspondence.Eric Stencil - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):2-26.
Ludwik Fleck on proto-ideas in medicine.Stig Brorson - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):147-152.
Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole: Logic or the Art of Thinking.Jill Vance Buroker (ed.) - 1996 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Logic, or, The art of thinking: containing, besides common rules, several new observations appropriate for forming judgment.Antoine Arnauld - 1996 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Pierre Nicole & Jill Vance Buroker.
A probabilistic theory of knowledge.Igal Kvart - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):1–43.
Arnauld's Verbal Distinction between Ideas and Perceptions.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):375-390.
Arnauld’s God.Steven Nadler - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 517-538.
The 'theory theory' of mind and the aims of Sellars' original myth of Jones.James R. O’Shea - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (2):175-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
49 (#324,348)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Arnauld's Verbal Distinction between Ideas and Perceptions.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):375-390.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references