Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The attitude that ordinary language description of experience is in fact a description of the world is called “naïve realism.” There is an entire branch of modern Western philosophy that is devoted to critically examining the assumptions behind the everyday language we use to describe the macroscopic world in which we live and the validity of naïve realism as an adequate description of the world. This branch of philosophy is called “ordinary language philosophy.” Surprisingly, it has something in common with quantum physics: insight into the inadequacy of ordinary language to describe observable reality. It is this connection between ordinary language philosophy and quantum physics that we shall explore in this article. In the process, we shall also offer a basic introduction to both basic philosophy and basic quantum theory|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ravi Gomatam (2005). Do Hodgson's Propositions Uniquely Characterize Free Will? Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (1):32-40.
Avner Baz (2012). When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Avner Baz (2012). When Words Are Called For: In Defense of Ordinary Language. Harvard University Press.
Oswald Hanfling (2000). Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of Our Tongue. Routledge.
Sally Parker Ryan (2010). Reconsidering Ordinary Language Philosophy: Malcolm’s (Moore’s) Ordinary Language Argument. Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):123-149.
Sally Parker-Ryan, Ordinary Language Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Added to index2012-06-15
Total downloads7 ( #142,564 of 740,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?