David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
After determining one set of skills that we hoped our students were learning in the introductory philosophy class at Carnegie Mellon University, we designed an experiment, performed twice over the course of two semesters, to test whether they were actually learning these skills. In addition, there were four different lectures of this course in the Spring of 2004, and five in the Fall of 2004; and the students of Lecturer I (in both semesters) were taught the material using argument diagrams as a tool to aid understanding and critical evaluation, while the other students were taught using more traditional methods. We were interested in whether this tool would help the students develop the skills we hoped they would master in this course. In each lecture, the students were given a pre-test at the beginning of the semester, and a structurally identical post-test at the end. We determined that the students did develop the skills in which we were interested over the course of the semester. We also determined that the students who were able to construct argument diagrams gained significantly more than the other students. We conclude that learning how to construct argument diagrams improves a student's ability to analyze, comprehend, and evaluate arguments
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
W. Martin Davies (2007). Cognitive Contours: Recent Work on Cross-Cultural Psychology and its Relevance for Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (1):13-42.
Similar books and articles
Maralee Harrell (2012). Assessing the Efficacy of Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking Skills in Introduction to Philosophy. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):31-39.
Frank Codispoti (2011). The Academic College Course is An Argument. Inquiry 26 (1):47-54.
Ann van Heerden (2011). Transforming a Content-Driven Chemistry Course to One Focused on Critical Thinking Skills Without Sacrificing Any Content. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):31-36.
Andrea Giampetro-Meyer (2004). The Social Fallout of Critical Thinking. Inquiry 23 (3):27-31.
Kurt Mosser (2006). Looking for a Fight. Teaching Philosophy 29 (4):343-362.
Ramona Ilea & Susan Hawthorne (2011). Beyond Service Learning. Teaching Philosophy 34 (3):219-240.
Kevin D. Ashley (2009). Teaching a Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals. Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):321-370.
Jennifer Wilson Mulnix & M. J. Mulnix (2010). Using a Writing Portfolio Project to Teach Critical Thinking Skills. Teaching Philosophy 33 (1):27-54.
Stephen Lewis (2005). Philosophizing Incognito. Teaching Philosophy 28 (3):237-247.
Kevin L. Flores, Gina S. Matkin, Mark E. Burbach, Courtney E. Quinn & Heath Harding (2012). Deficient Critical Thinking Skills Among College Graduates: Implications for Leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (2):212-230.
Maria Cimitile (2008). The Use of Bloom's Taxonomy in Feminist Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 31 (4):297-310.
Linda K. Elksnin (2005). Using Cases to Improve the Critical Thinking Skills of Prospective Teachers. Inquiry 24 (3):5-15.
Jennifer Wilson Mulnix (2010). Using a Writing Portfolio Project to Teach Critical Thinking Skills. Teaching Philosophy 33 (1):27-54.
Nancy Slonneger Hancock (2006). Logic for the LSAT. Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):125-155.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads17 ( #139,311 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #69,930 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?