Introducing a Method for Calculating the Allocation of Attention in a Cognitive “Two-Armed Bandit” Procedure: Probability Matching Gives Way to Maximizing

Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Matching and maximizing in concurrent schedules.Gene M. Heyman - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (5):496-500.
Concept learning and probability matching.George Mandler, Philip A. Cowan & Cecile Gold - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):514.
Probabilities and epistemic pluralism.Eric Christian Barnes - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):31-47.
Some factors in probability matching.Irvin Rubinstein - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (6):413.
On the redress of grievances.J. M. Alexander - 2013 - Analysis 73 (2):228-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
30 (#533,217)

6 months
14 (#179,394)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gene Heyman
Boston College

References found in this work

Strategies and models of selective attention.Anne M. Treisman - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (3):282-299.
The cognitive side of probability learning.W. K. Estes - 1976 - Psychological Review 83 (1):37-64.
Visual attention.Marvin Chun & Jeremy Wolfe - 2001 - In E. B. Goldstein (ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Perception. Blackwell. pp. 2--335.

View all 7 references / Add more references