Negative existentials, omniscience, and cosmic luck

Religious Studies 34 (4):375-401 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suppose there are possible worlds in which God exists but Anselm does not. Then (I argue) there are possible worlds in which Anselm does not exist, but God cannot even entertain the thought that he does not. In such worlds Anselm does not exist, but God does not know that. This, I argue, is incompatible with (a straightforward construal of) the doctrine of God's essential omniscience. Considerations involving negative existentials also call into question a certain picture of creation, on which God chooses which particular (possible) individuals to create. They suggest that there is an element of brute contingency about which individuals exist

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Omniscience and maximal power.Thomas Metcalf - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
Taking the Nature of God Seriously.Nicholas Maxwell - 2013 - In Asa Kasher & Jeanine Diller (eds.), Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Unknowable Truths and the Doctrine of Omniscience.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1989 - Journal of the American Academy of Religion 57:485-507.
God, the Best, and Evil.Bruce Langtry - 2008 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
89 (#190,069)

6 months
14 (#175,298)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Hughes
King's College London

Citations of this work

The Nature of Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2017 - Res Philosophica 94 (3):359-383.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references