A modified dutch book argument
Philosophical Studies 29 (6):403 - 407 (1976)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlan Hájek (2005). Scotching Dutch Books? Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):139–151.
Christopher Hitchcock (2004). Beauty and the Bets. Synthese 139 (3):405 - 420.
Brad Armendt (1993). Dutch Books, Additivity, and Utility Theory. Philosophical Topics 21 (1):1-20.
Brian Weatherson (1999). Begging the Question and Bayesians. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30:687-697.
Barbara Davidson & Robert Pargetter (1985). In Defence of the Dutch Book Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):405 - 423.
Alan Hájek (2008). Arguments for–or Against–Probabilism? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):793 - 819.
Colin Howson (1992). Dutch Book Arguments and Consistency. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:161 - 168.
Brad Armendt (1980). Is There a Dutch Book Argument for Probability Kinematics? Philosophy of Science 47 (4):583-588.
Colin Howson (1989). Subjective Probabilities and Betting Quotients. Synthese 81 (1):1 - 8.
C. Waidacher (1997). Hidden Assumptions in the Dutch Book Argument. Theory and Decision 43 (3):293-312.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
