David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 323-324 (2008)
The book covers a long period of the history of British moral philosophy, from the Cam-bridge Platonists to Hume, through Shaftesbury and Hutcheson. The choice of authors, which leaves aside such major figures as Adam Smith and Reid, is justified by the focus on the issue of the relationships between morality and human nature. Hume is the end of the story insofar as he liberates moral theory from a normative conception of human nature so that, contrary to his predecessors, he suggests that ‘good’ is not synonymous with ‘natural’ in the sense that ‘evil’ would be synonymous with ‘unnatural’. Gill’s survey of the British moralists terminates with Hume because it purposes to characterize the “Copernican” inversion carried out by Hume as the result of a gradual shift from an initially “Ptolemaic” position: drawing on Hutcheson’s account of moral judgment, Hume ascribes to psychological states that which traditional moral philosophy used to attribute to the nature of things. Hume goes further than either Shaftesbury or Hutcheson, since he transforms moral philosophy into a theoretical or “metaphysical” undertaking
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
D. H. Monro (1972). A Guide to the British Moralists. London,Fontana.
Neil G. Robertson (2009). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):221-224.
James A. Harris (2006). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Hume Studies 32 (2):362-365.
Kyle Swan (2007). Critical Study of Michael Gill, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. In Philo. 177-186.
Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2007). Review of Michael B. Gill, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (8).
J. B. Schneewind (2008). Michael Gill, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 359pp, $96 Hb. ISBN: 978-0521852463. [REVIEW] Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):209-217.
Laurent Jaffro (2008). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):323-324.
Roberta M. Berry (2009). Pt. 3. The Malleability of Human Nature. Reflections on Secular Foundationalism and Our Human Future / Stephen Erickson ; Nature as Second Nature : Plasticity and Habit / Peter Wake ; The Posthumanist Challenge to a Partly Naturalized Virtue Ethics. [REVIEW] In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer.
Terence Penelhum (1997). Book Review:The British Moralists and the Internal "Ought": 1640-1740. Stephen Darwall. [REVIEW] Ethics 108 (1):218-.
Michael Gill (2006). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge ;Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #217,174 of 1,692,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?