'Relative Ignorance': Lingua and linguaggio in Gramsci's concept of a formative aesthetic as a concern for power
Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6):579-597 (2011)
| Abstract | This essay looks at the relationship between formative aesthetics, language and the historical anticipation that begins with Antonio Gramsci's discussion of Kant's idea of noumenon. In Gramsci both education (as formazione) and aesthetics stem from a concern for power in terms of the hegemonic relations that are inherent to history as a political horizon. The title cites Gramci's suggestion that Kant's noumenon should be read as a proviso set apart by a ‘relative ignorance’ of reality [‘relativa ignoranza’ della realtà] to be resolved by a future science. Yet far from another epistemological layering, a future science must also resolve those hegemonic relations of power that emerge from formation as a political act figured in the agonistic character of language as lingua and linguaggio. Further down the lane of our ‘relative ignorance’ we are confronted by a Post-Taylorist condition that precludes any false hopes of a reversal of society's educational, economic and political misfortunes. Yet, while Post-Taylorism confirms that this state of affairs is irreversible, a deeper inquiry into the aesthetic-agonistic character of formation could afford us answers that are in no way solutions but, because adept to struggle and are characteristically aesthetical, might provide an understanding of the logic of irreversibility. Because it remains conscious of its ‘relative ignorance’, this assumption offers a hopeful approach that comes to us sideways; thereby avoiding the predicament of what Lyotard and Thébaud regarded as a condition where ‘the prescriptive is derived from the descriptive’ | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid West (1987). Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power. Inquiry 30 (1 & 2):137 – 154.
Iain Atack (2006). Nonviolent Political Action and the Limits of Consent. Theoria 53 (111):87-107.
Bob Jessop (2005). Gramsci as a Spatial Theorist. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):421-437.
John D. Holst (2009). The Revolutionary Party in Gramsci's Pre-Prison Educational and Political Theory and Practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (6):622-639.
Adam David Morton (2005). A Double Reading of Gramsci: Beyond the Logic of Contingency. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):439-453.
Kees van Der Pijl (2005). Gramsci and Left Managerialism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):499-511.
Kees van Der Pijl (2005). Gramsci and Left Managerialism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):499-511.
Peter Ives (2005). Language, Agency and Hegemony: A Gramscian Response to Post‐Marxism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):455-468.
Lorraine Code (2004). The Power Of Ignorance. Philosophical Papers 33 (3):291-308.
Peter Ives (2009). Global English, Hegemony and Education: Lessons From Gramsci. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (6):661-683.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-11Total downloads6 ( #147,143 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,122 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
