Discussion of mr. Nagel's rejoinder
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (3):350-353 (1945)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul G. Muscari (1987). The Status of Humans in Nagel's Phenomenology. Philosophical Forum 19:23-33.
Raphael van Riel (2011). Nagelian Reduction Beyond the Nagel Model. Philosophy of Science 78 (3):353-375.
Terence Rajivan Edward (2009). Nagel on Concievability. Abstracta 5 (1):16-29.
Felix Kaufmann (1944). Concerning Mr. Nagel's Critical Comments. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (1):69-74.
B. R. Tilghman (1991). What is It Like to Be an Aardvark? Philosophy 66 (July):325-38.
Michael Gorman (2005). Nagasawa Vs. Nagel: Omnipotence, Pseudo-Tasks, and a Recent Discussion of Nagel's Doubts About Physicalism. Inquiry 48 (5):436 – 447.
Scott F. Aikin, Michael Harbour & Robert B. Talisse (2010). Nagel on Public Education and Intelligent Design. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:209-219.
Ernest Nagel (1946). Professor Reichenbach on Quantum Mechanics: A Rejoinder. Journal of Philosophy 43 (9):247-250.
Ernest Nagel (1965). A Rejoinder to Putnam. Journal of Philosophy 62 (16):429-432.
Ernest Nagel (1944). Rejoinder to Mr. Kaufmann's Reply. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (1):75-79.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
