Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory

Walter de Gruyter (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two treatises on memory which have come down to us from antiquity are Aristotle’s “On memory and recollection” and Plotinus’ “On perception and memory” ; the latter also wrote at length about memory in his “Problems connected with the soul”. In both authors memory is treated as a ‘modest’ faculty: both authors assume the existence of a persistent subject to whom memory belongs; and basic cognitive capacities are assumed on which memory depends. In particular, both theories use phantasia to explain memory. Aristotle takes representations to be changes in concrete living things which arise from actual perception. To be connected to the original perception the representation has to be taken as a copy of the original experience ‑ this is the way Aristotle defines memory at the end of his investigation. Plotinus does not define memory: he is concerned with the question of what remembers. This is of course the soul, which goes through different stages of incarnation and disincarnation. Since the disembodied soul can remember, so he does not have Aristotle’s resources for explaining the continued presence of representations as changes in the concrete thing. Instead, he thinks that when acquiring a memory we acquire a capacity in respect of the object of the memory, namely to make it present at a later time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re-membering.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:43-59.
Bergson's Philosophy of Memory.Trevor Perri - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (12):837-847.
Memory and materiality.Katrina Schlunke - 2013 - Memory Studies 6:253-261.
Visual Memory and the Bounds of Authenticity.Sven Bernecker - 2015 - In Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, Volker Munz & Annalisa Coliva (eds.), Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 445-464.
On the Mind’s Pronouncement of Time.Michael R. Kelly - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:247-262.
Memory in Plotinus.Edward W. Warren - 1965 - Classical Quarterly 15 (02):252-.
Memory, responsibility, and identity.Ross Poole - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (1):263-286.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-18

Downloads
37 (#424,620)

6 months
8 (#347,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Alfred King
University of Berne

Citations of this work

What memory is.Stan Klein - 2015 - WIREs Cognitive Science 6 (1):1-38.
I—Memory from Plato to Damascius.Peter Adamson - 2019 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93 (1):161-184.
Taking Time.Chelsea Harry - 2015 - In Chronos in Aristotle’s Physics. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. pp. 51-67.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references