Designing Guiding Systems for Brain-Computer Interfaces

&
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fnhum.2017.00396

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Committing Crimes with BCIs: How Brain-Computer Interface Users can Satisfy Actus Reus and be Criminally Responsible.Kramer Thompson - 2021 - Neuroethics 14 (S3):311-322.
Ghost in the Machine: A Philosophical Analysis of the Relationship Between Brain-Computer Interface Applications and their Users.Richard Heersmink - 2009 - Dissertation, University of Twente.
Beyond the responsibility gap. Discussion note on responsibility and liability in the use of brain-computer interfaces.Gerd Grübler - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (4):377-382.
Designing user interfaces for problem solving, with application to hypertext and creative writing.Harold Thimbleby - 1994 - AI and Society 8 (1):29-44.
Brain–computer interfaces and dualism: a problem of brain, mind, and body.Joseph Lee - 2016 - AI and Society 31 (1):29-40.
Brain-computer interfaces the key for the conscious brain locked into a paralysed body.A. K.?bler & N. Neumann - 2006 - In Steven Laureys (ed.), Boundaries of Consciousness. Elsevier.
Brain to computer communication: Ethical perspectives on interaction models. [REVIEW]Guglielmo Tamburrini - 2009 - Neuroethics 2 (3):137-149.
The Epistemic Value of Brain–Machine Systems for the Study of the Brain.Edoardo Datteri - 2017 - Minds and Machines 27 (2):287-313.
The role of cognitive modeling for user interface design representations: An epistemological analysis of knowledge engineering in the context of human-computer interaction. [REVIEW]Markus F. Peschl & Chris Stary - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):203-236.
Embodied tools, cognitive tools and brain-computer interfaces.Richard Heersmink - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (1):207-219.
Epistemological and phenomenological issues in the use of brain-computer interfaces.Richard Heersmink - 2011 - In C. Ess & R. Hagengruber (eds.), Proceedings of the International Association for Computing and Philosophy 2011 (pp. 98-102). MV-Wissenschaft.
Bigger data for big data: From Twitter to brain–computer interfaces.Etienne B. Roesch, Frederic Stahl & Mohamed Medhat Gaber - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):97-98.
Are We Sims? How Computer Simulations Represent and What this Means for the Simulation Argument.Claus Beisbart - 2014 - The Monist 97 (3):399-417.
Wired Emotions: Ethical Issues of Affective Brain–Computer Interfaces.Steffen Steinert & Orsolya Friedrich - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1):351-367.
Privacy Concerns in Brain–Computer Interfaces.Jan Christoph Bublitz - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):30-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-02

Downloads
9 (#1,257,418)

6 months
4 (#796,773)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references