Psychological conflict and human nature: The case of behaviourism and cognition

A reasonable choice between Skinner's and Chomsky's theories requires reference to a conception of human nature. It is explained in detail why this is so, in the context of an analysis of what it is to ‘choose’ a theory. This account helps to explain the unity and coherence of the science, methodology, conception of science, object of scientific inquiry and views towards control of each of Skinner and Chomsky, and thereby explains the chasm which separates the parties to their respective programs. The analysis given implies that, in a precise sense, the theory-choice is implicated in value-judgments
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1980.tb00012.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bruce N. Waller (1982). Mentalistic Problems in Cicourel's Cognitive Sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (2):177–200.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #331,784 of 1,902,524 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #452,252 of 1,902,524 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.