Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium—monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project

BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-14 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of genetic test results in risk-rated insurance is a significant concern internationally, with many countries banning or restricting the use of genetic test results in underwriting. In Australia, life insurers’ use of genetic test results is legal and self-regulated by the insurance industry (Financial Services Council (FSC)). In 2018, an Australian Parliamentary Inquiry recommended that insurers’ use of genetic test results in underwriting should be prohibited. In 2019, the FSC introduced an industry self-regulated moratorium on the use of genetic test results. In the absence of government oversight, it is critical that the impact, effectiveness and appropriateness of the moratorium is monitored. Here we describe the protocol of our government-funded research project, which will serve that critical function between 2020 and 2023.MethodsA realist evaluation framework was developed for the project, using a context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) approach, to systematically assess the impact of the moratorium for a range of stakeholders. Outcomes which need to be achieved for the moratorium to accomplish its intended aims were identified, and specific data collection measures methods were developed to gather the evidence from relevant stakeholder groups (consumers, health professionals, financial industry and genetic research community) to determine if aims are achieved. Results from each arm of the study will be analysed and published in peer-reviewed journals as they become available.DiscussionThe A-GLIMMER project will provide essential monitoring of the impact and effectiveness of the self-regulated insurance moratorium. On completion of the study (3 years) a Stakeholder Report will be compiled. The Stakeholder Report will synthesise the evidence gathered in each arm of the study and use the CMO framework to evaluate the extent to which each of the outcomes have been achieved, and make evidence-based recommendations to the Australian federal government, life insurance industry and other stakeholders.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Life, Health, and Disability Insurance: Understanding the Relationships.Robert H. Jerry - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S2):80-89.
Genetics and the British insurance industry.E. D. Cook - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):157-162.
Life, Health, and Disability Insurance: Understanding the Relationships.Robert H. Jerry - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (s2):80-89.
Life, Health, and Disability Insurance: Understanding the Relationships.Robert Jerry Ii - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (s2):80-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-22

Downloads
14 (#990,629)

6 months
8 (#361,305)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?