Pshaw!
| Abstract | Since my proposed framework for meaning (in Holist" and Atomist") is neither simply a psychosemantic holism nor simply a psychosemantic atomism, but a marriage in which the two have become one, we might call it a psychosemantic holism-atomism wedlock (PSHAW). In this paper I want to. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesK. Becker (1998). On the Perfectly General Nature of Instability in Meaning Holism. Journal of Philosophy 95 (12):635-640.
Pierre Demeulenaere (2000). Individualism and Holism: New Controversies in the Philosophy of Social Science. Mind and Society 1 (2):3-16.
Carlo Penco (2004). Wittgenstein, Locality and Rules. In Annalisa Coliva & Eva Picardi (eds.), Wittgenstein Today. Il Poligrafo.
Joseph Levine (1993). Intentional Chemistry. In Joseph Levine (ed.), Holism: A Consumer Update. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kirk A. Ludwig (1993). Is Content Holism Incoherent? Grazer Philosophische Studien 46:173-195.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (1998). Multiple Meanings and Stability of Content. Journal of Philosophy 95 (5):255-63.
Eric Lormand (1996). How to Be a Meaning Holist. Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):51-73.
Richard Horsey (2001). Psychosemantic Analyticity. [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,673 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
