David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Monist 96 (2):295-308 (2013)
The Monist’s call for papers for this issue ended: “if formalism is true, then it must be possible in principle to mechanize meaning in a conscious thinking and language-using machine; if intentionalism is true, no such project is intelligible”. We use the Grelling-Nelson paradox to show that natural language is indefinitely extensible, which has two important consequences: it cannot be formalized and model theoretic semantics, standard for formal languages, is not suitable for it. We also point out that object-object mapping theories of semantics, the usual account for the possibility of non intentional semantics, doesn’t seem able to account for the indefinitely extensible productivity of natural language.
|Keywords||natural language formalization indefinite extensibility. universe of discourse semantics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laureano Luna (2009). A Note On Formal Reasoning with Extensible Domain. The Reasoner 3 (7):5-6.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2015). Varieties of Indefinite Extensibility. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (1):147-166.
Laureano Luna & William Taylor (2010). Cantor's Proof in the Full Definable Universe. Australasian Journal of Logic 9:11-25.
William J. Rapaport (1988). Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural Language Understanding. In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of AI. Kluwer
Jose Luis Bermudez (2009). Truth, Indefinite Extensibility, and Fitch's Paradox. In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press
Chris Fox (2005). Foundations of Intensional Semantics. Blackwell Pub..
Peter Clark (1993). Sets and Indefinitely Extensible Concepts and Classes. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67:235--249.
Stewart Shapiro (2003). Prolegomenon to Any Future Neo-Logicist Set Theory: Abstraction and Indefinite Extensibility. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):59--91.
Daniel Bonevac (1984). Systems of Substitutional Semantics. Philosophy of Science 51 (4):631-656.
William J. Rapaport (1993). Because Mere Calculating Isn't Thinking: Comments on Hauser's Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?. Minds and Machines 3 (1):11-20.
Patrick Blackburn (2005). Representation and Inference for Natural Language: A First Course in Computational Semantics. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Added to index2012-08-22
Total downloads205 ( #15,964 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)50 ( #11,220 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?