Safety requirements vs. crashing ethically: what matters most for policies on autonomous vehicles

AI and Society:1-11 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The philosophical–ethical literature and the public debate on autonomous vehicles have been obsessed with ethical issues related to crashing. In this article, these discussions, including more empirical investigations, will be critically assessed. It is argued that a related and more pressing issue is questions concerning safety. For example, what should we require from autonomous vehicles when it comes to safety? What do we mean by ‘safety’? How do we measure it? In response to these questions, the article will present a foundation for a continued discussion on these issues and an argument for why discussions about safety should be prioritized over ethical concerns related to crashing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Irresponsibilities, inequalities and injustice for autonomous vehicles.Hin-Yan Liu - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (3):193-207.
Safety, risk acceptability, and morality.James A. E. Macpherson - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):377-390.
How Can Sanctuary Policies be Justified?Shelley Wilcox - 2019 - Public Affairs Quarterly 33 (2):89-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-08

Downloads
94 (#181,510)

6 months
17 (#145,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Björn Lundgren
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

References found in this work

The limits of morality.Shelly Kagan - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: an Introduction.Ibo van de Poel - 2011 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Lambèr M. M. Royakkers.

View all 22 references / Add more references