David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 39 (1):29-51 (2009)
The goal of this article is to outline a triangular nexus between life, death, and attention. Not only does the act of attending animate or enliven consciousness in the passage from inactional and indeterminate potentiality to the actional determination of a noema but it also coincides with intentionality, itself the form of life proper to consciousness. Upon outlining the “enlivening” element in attention and the overlap between attention and psychic life as such, I will discuss its deadening aspects understood both in terms of the petrifaction resulting from a fixed, attentive, captivated gaze and, more positively, in terms of the potentiality of the inactional mode, in which consciousness lies dormant
|Keywords||intentionality consciousness death attention life|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
P. Sven Arvidson (2013). Restructuring Attentionality and Intentionality. Human Studies 36 (2):199-216.
Similar books and articles
Fumihiko Sueki (2008). Buddhist Philosophy of the Dead. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:259-265.
John Marmysz (1996). From Night to Day: Nihilism and the Living Dead. Film and Philosophy 3:138-143.
J. Jeremy Wisnewski (2009). What We Owe the Dead. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):54-70.
Matthew P. J. Dillon (2000). The Unquiet Grave S. I. Johnston: Restless Dead. Encounters Between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece . Pp. XXI + 329. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1999. Cased, £30. Isbn: 0-520-21707-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):512-.
Kieran Cashell (2007). Ex Post Facto: Peirce and the Living Signs of the Dead. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):345-372.
Douglas C. Long (1994). Why Machines Can Neither Think nor Feel. In Dale W. Jamieson (ed.), Language, Mind and Art. Kluwer
David Hershenov (2005). Do Dead Bodies Pose a Problem for Biological Approaches to Personal Identity? Mind 114 (453):31 - 59.
Robert M. Veatch (2004). Abandon the Dead Donor Rule or Change the Definition of Death? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):261-276.
H. S. Harris (1967). What is Living and What is Dead in the Philosophy of Croce? Dialogue 6 (03):399-405.
Walter J. Ong (1961). The Living and the Dead. Modern Schoolman 38 (2):169-170.
Leonhard James Russell (1970). What is Living and What is Dead in the Philosophy of Leibniz. Torino,Edizioni Di Filosofia.
F. G. Miller, R. D. Truog & D. W. Brock (2010). The Dead Donor Rule: Can It Withstand Critical Scrutiny? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3):299-312.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads16 ( #163,836 of 1,725,157 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,161 of 1,725,157 )
How can I increase my downloads?