David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):123-135 (2010)
With great sympathy for Roman Ingarden and his work, Edith Stein edited his book project The Literary Work Of Art. In the letters she exchanges with him shereflects on relationship between reality and ideality: she writes that those who do not see the world as a reality must be fools. The political events in the 1930s had an impact on phenomenology. While Edmund Husserl dissociates himself from his protégé Martin Heidegger with regard to the content of his philosophy as well as with regard to his ideology, Edith Stein distances herself more and more from the phenomenological method, seeing it as removed from reality, and she eventually become a Carmelite nun. Roman Ingarden, on the other hand, reconsiders interpreting phenomenology as aesthetic theory. Literature and film are being re-analysed in terms of phenomenological mediality and as factors of human communication
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Amie Thomasson, Roman Ingarden. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Daniel von Wachter (2005). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like. In A. Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos.
Roman Ingarden (1962). Edith Stein on Her Activity as an Assistant of Edmund Husserl. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (2):155-175.
Daniel von Wachter (2010). Roman Ingarden's Theory of Causation Revised. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):183-196.
Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2012). Roman Ingarden. In Antonio Cimino & Vincenzo Costa (eds.), Storia della fenomenologia. Carocci Editore.
Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2004). Roman Ingarden. Ontology From a Phenomenological Point of View. Reports on Philosophy 22:121-142.
Peter McCormick (1976). The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. By Roman Ingarden. Translated by G. G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Pp. Lxxiii, 415, $15.The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. By Roman Ingarden. Translated by R. A. Crowley and K. R. Olson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Pp. Xxx, 436. $15.Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics: Essays. Edited by P. Graff and S. Krzemién-Ojak. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, 1975. Pp. 267. [REVIEW] Dialogue 15 (03):511-515.
Asbjörn Aarnes & Roman Ingarden (1967). Roman Ingarden en Norvège. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 72 (3):332 - 343.
Daniel von Wachter (2005). Roman Ingarden's Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like. In Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos Verlag. 55-82.
Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2005). Intentionalität, Zeitbewusstsein Und Intersubjektivität. Studien Zur Phänomenologie von Brentano Bis Ingarden. Ontos.
Roman Ingarden, John Fizer & Hershel B. Chipp (1970). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28 (4):541-543.
Jeff Mitscherling (1985). Roman Ingarden's "the Literary Work of Art": Exposition and Analyses. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (3):351-381.
Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (ed.) (1959). For Roman Ingarden. 'S-Gravenhage, M. Nijhoff.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads1 ( #394,627 of 1,096,320 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #224,942 of 1,096,320 )
How can I increase my downloads?