The Unexpected Applicability of Paraconsistent Logic: A Chomskyan Route to Dialetheism [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Foundations of Science 18 (4):625-640 (2013)
|Abstract||Paraconsistent logics are characterized by rejection of ex falso quodlibet, the principle of explosion, which states that from a contradiction, anything can be derived. Strikingly these logics have found a wide range of application, despite the misgivings of philosophers as prominent as Lewis and Putnam. Such applications, I will argue, are of significant philosophical interest. They suggest ways to employ these logics in philosophical and scientific theories. To this end I will sketch out a ‘naturalized semantic dialetheism’ following Priest’s early suggestion that the principles governing human natural language may well be inconsistent. There will be a significant deviation from Priest’s work, namely, the assumption of a broadly Chomskyan picture of semantics. This allows us to explain natural language inconsistency tolerance without commitment to contentious views in formal logic|
|Keywords||Chomsky dialetheism inconsistency Tolerance language paraconsistent priest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bryson Brown (1999). Yes, Virginia, There Really Are Paraconsistent Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
Joachim Bromand (2002). Why Paraconsistent Logic Can Only Tell Half the Truth. Mind 111 (444):741-749.
Elena Ficara (2013). Dialectic and Dialetheism. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):35-52.
Newton C. A. da Costa & Décio Krause, Remarks on the Applications of Paraconsistent Logic to Physics.
Greg Restall (2002). Paraconsistency Everywhere. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli (1986). On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic. Philosophia 16 (3-4).
Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli (1986). On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic. Philosophia 16 (3-4):293-305.
O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky (2011). Ideal Paraconsistent Logics. Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.
Joke Meheus (2000). An Extremely Rich Paraconsistent Logic and the Adaptive Logic Based on It. In Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic. Research Studies Press.
Andrzej Wiśniewski, Guido Vanackere & Dorota Leszczyńska (2005). Socratic Proofs and Paraconsistency: A Case Study. Studia Logica 80 (2-3):431 - 466.
Tommaso Piazza & Francesco Piazza (2010). On Inconsistent Entities. A Reply to Colyvan. Philosophical Studies 150 (2):301 - 311.
M. W. Bunder (1984). Some Definitions of Negation Leading to Paraconsistent Logics. Studia Logica 43 (1-2):75 - 78.
Added to index2012-06-06
Total downloads8 ( #131,747 of 732,509 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 732,509 )
How can I increase my downloads?