Mind 116 (464):1079 - 1081 (2007)
|Abstract||Professor Tennant and I agree on much regarding the proof-theoretic semantics of free logic. Here I point to two issues, one on which we disagree, the other on which I find it hard to say how closely we may agree. The first concerns the exact content of Tennant's Rule of Atomic Denotation. The second concerns the nature of assumptions whose formal counterparts contain parametric occurrences of names|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jon Cogburn (2003). Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism. Synthese 134 (3):353 - 362.
Karel Lambert (2003). Free Logic: Selected Essays. New Yorkcambridge University Press.
Karel Lambert (1981). On the Philosophical Foundations of Free Logic. Inquiry 24 (2):147 – 203.
Kevin Timpe (forthcoming). Free WIll. In Neil Manson & Bob Barnard (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Metaphysics. Continuum.
Norbert Gratzl (2010). A Sequent Calculus for a Negative Free Logic. Studia Logica 96 (3):331-348.
Karel Lambert (ed.) (1991). Philosophical Applications of Free Logic. Oxford University Press.
Neil Tennant (2007). Existence and Identity in Free Logic: A Problem for Inferentialism? Mind 116 (464):1055 - 1078.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #78,584 of 549,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,272 of 549,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?