David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1993)
Can we know anything for certain? There are those who think we can (traditionally labeled the "dogmatists") and those who think we cannot (traditionally labeled the "skeptics"). The theory of knowledge, or epistemology, is the great debate between the two. This book is an introductory and historically-based survey of the debate. It sides for the most part with the skeptics. It also develops out of skepticism a third view, fallibilism or critical rationalism, which incorporates an uncompromising realism about perception, science, and the nature of truth.
|Keywords||Knowledge, Theory of|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$42.00 used (34% off) $44.29 direct from Amazon (8% off) $133.18 new Amazon page|
|Call number||BD161.M89 1992|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. Scott Smith (2011). Naturalism and Our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-Claims. Ashgate.
Peter Carruthers (1992). Human Knowledge and Human Nature: A New Introduction to an Ancient Debate. Oxford University Press.
Michael Williams (2001). Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. OUP Oxford.
Howard Sankey (2010). Science, Common Sense and Reality. Discusiones Filosóficas 11:41-58.
Paul K. Moser (ed.) (1998). The Theory of Knowledge: A Thematic Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Sherrilyn Roush (2007). Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence, and Science. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Hetherington, Fallibilism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #55,470 of 1,013,585 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,884 of 1,013,585 )
How can I increase my downloads?