Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (2007)
|Abstract||Sherrilyn Roush defends a new theory of knowledge and evidence, based on the idea of "tracking" the truth, as the best approach to a wide range of questions about knowledge-related phenomena. The theory explains, for example, why scepticism is frustrating, why knowledge is power, and why better evidence makes you more likely to have knowledge. Tracking Truth provides a unification of the concepts of knowledge and evidence, and argues against traditional epistemological realist and anti-realist positions about scientific theories and for a piecemeal approach based on a criterion of evidence, a position Roush calls "real anti-realism." Epistemologists and philosophers of science will recognize this as a significant original contribution|
|Keywords||Truth Knowledge, Theory of Evidence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$12.39 used (73% off) $16.87 new (63% off) $42.75 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD171.R72 2007|
|ISBN(s)||0199232938 0199274738 9780199274734 9780199232932|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Angus Ross (1986). Why Do We Believe What We Are Told? Ratio (1):69-88.
Horacio Arló-Costa (2006). Review of Sherrilyn Roush, Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence and Science. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (7).
Jonathan Schaffer (2003). Perceptual Knowledge Derailed. Philosophical Studies 112 (1):31-45.
Steven Gross (2012). Davidson, First-Person Authority, and the Evidence for Semantics. In Gerhard Preyer (ed.), Donald Davidson on Truth, Meaning, and the Mental. Oxford University Press.
Eric Christian Barnes (2008). Evidence and Leverage: Comment on Roush. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):549-557.
Howard Sankey (2007). Review of Sherrin Roush, Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence, and Science. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 61 (1):158-159.
Sherrilyn Roush (2009). Précis of Tracking Truth. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):213-222.
Damien Fennell & Nancy Cartwright (2010). Does Roush Show That Evidence Should Be Probable? Synthese 175 (3):289 - 310.
Alvin I. Goldman (2009). Recursive Tracking Versus Process Reliabilism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):223-230.
Eric Christian Barnes (2008). Review: Review Article: Evidence and Leverage: Comment on Roush. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):549 - 557.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,456 of 739,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,344 )
How can I increase my downloads?