Adaptationism and intuitions about modern criminal justice

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):31-32 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research indicates that individuals have incoherent intuitions about particular features of the criminal justice system. This could be seen as an argument against the existence of adapted computational systems for counter-exploitation. Here, I outline how the model developed by McCullough et al. readily predicts the production of conflicting intuitions in the context of modern criminal justice issues

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review essay / Dominion as the target of criminal justice.C. L. Ten - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (2):40-46.
Review essay / A theory of criminal justice.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1982 - Criminal Justice Ethics 1 (2):60-64.
Terrorizing Criminal Law.Lucia Zedner - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):99-121.
Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity.Jonathan Jacobs - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
Criminal Justice: An Introduction to Philosophies, Theories and Practice.Ian Marsh - 2004 - Routledge. Edited by John Cochrane & Gaynor Melville.
Are moral intuitions self‐evident truths?Richard A. Shweder - 1994 - Criminal Justice Ethics 13 (2):24-31.
Review essay / mental illness and criminal justice.Jerome Neu - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (2):62-67.
Now is the Time to Reform our Criminal Justice System.Jim Webb - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (2):163-167.
Criminal justice.J. Roland Pennock & John William Chapman (eds.) - 1985 - New York: New York University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
21 (#737,705)

6 months
5 (#639,324)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?