"Modernism" Versus "Traditionalism" in Bourgeois Studies of International Relations

Russian Studies in Philosophy 14 (2):69-96 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Implementation of the Peace Program propounded by the Twenty-Fourth Congress of the CPSU is substantially furthered by the struggle against bourgeois ideology in a field directly related to interpretation of the principal problems of contemporary foreign policy - the field of the theory of international relations. Naturally, the success of this struggle depends in large degree on the depth and care with which one analyzes the conditions and tendencies characteristic of bourgeois studies of international politics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction to international relations.Robert H. Jackson - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Georg Sørensen.
The Surplus of Meaning. [REVIEW]Patrick L. Bourgeois - 1985 - International Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):98-100.
Aesthetic licence: Foucault's modernism and Kant's post-modernism.Salim Kemal - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (3):281 – 303.
Imagination, Totality, and Transcendence.Frank Schalow & Patrick L. Bourgeois - 1990 - International Studies in Philosophy 22 (1):59-71.
The International Relations of Middle-Earth: Learning From the Lord of the Rings.Abigail E. Ruane - 2012 - Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Edited by Patrick James.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
21 (#739,108)

6 months
4 (#794,133)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references