The Right of Reply to Professor Sheehan

Philosophy Today 60 (2):447-479 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I address the anti-academic procedures by which Professor Thomas Sheehan affirms that I “continue” a “scam,” before presenting in a greater detail my work on the notion of being as a code name in Heidegger. In sections 3, 4, and 5, I analyze the way in which Sheehan authoritatively hollows out the state of the debate around the interpretation of Heidegger and the weakness of his philological interpretation. Finally, in the last section, I return to the necessity of the research that Sheehan’s “Emmanuel Faye: The Introduction of Fraud Into Philosophy?” attempts to discredit.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Right of Reply to Professor Sheehan.Gaëtan Pégny - 2016 - Philosophy Today 60 (2):447-479.
Reply to Professor Bertocci.Hywel Lewis - 1979 - Religious Studies 15 (3):407 - 409.
A reply to Professor Seedhouse.M. H. Kottow - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):349-350.
A Reply to Professor Frankena.Philippa Foot - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (194):455 - 459.
Palatine Apollo: A Reply to Professor Richmond.J. H. Bishop - 1961 - Classical Quarterly 11 (1-2):127-.
Caring About the Social Determinants of Health.Peter Sheehan & Mark Sheehan - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (3):48-50.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Professor Wilm in Reply to Professor Hocking.Wendell T. Bush - 1914 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 11 (2):55.
A Rejoinder to Professor Hempel's Reply.J. W. N. Watkins - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (127):349 - 355.
Reply to professor Martinich.E. M. Curley - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):285-287.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-18

Downloads
14 (#988,032)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Editors' Note.Peg Birmingham & Ian Alexander Moore - 2022 - Philosophy Today 66 (4):829-830.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references