The Credibility of the Miraculous

Zygon 37 (3):751-758 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Miracle in a strict sense is to be discriminated from acts of special providence by its being radically unnatural in terms of prior expectation. The key issue in relation to credibility is theological in character, inasmuch as divine consistency must imply that miracles are capable of being understood as “signs,” affording deeper insight into the divine care for creation. These issues are explored by reference to scriptural miracles, particularly the virginal conception and the resurrection of Christ

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The supernatural and the miraculous.Steve Clarke - 2007 - Sophia 46 (3):277 - 285.
The miraculous choice argument for realism.Eric Barnes - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (2):97 - 120.
Miracles and Credibility.Robert Young - 1980 - Religious Studies 16 (4):465 - 468.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Embodiment of Miracle.Asokananda Prosad - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 49:59-65.
Miracles and Creation.Christopher Cherry - 1974 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (4):234 - 245.
Miracles.John King-Farlow - 1962 - International Philosophical Quarterly 2 (2):265-294.
Against Credibility.Joseph Shieber - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):1 - 18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
48 (#330,639)

6 months
3 (#969,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?