David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 30 (4):511 - 526 (1994)
This article brings together constructivist epistemology and feminist study of religion to provide phenomenological evidence that numinous consciousness is not the immediate, sui generis essence of religious experience that Rudolf Otto believed it to be. Whilst there are certain peculiarities in the Ottonian scheme that might make numinous consciousness unusually resistant to conceptual and ideological mediation, it can be shown that androcentric epistemological and axiological structures make the experience intelligible and worthy of accommodation within a given patriarchal religious tradition. By contrast, contemporary gynocentric spiritualities in which women celebrate their psychobiological difference as itself a necessary medium of religious experience, have no interest in protecting the holy from the limitations of its immanence.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Keith E. Yandell (1993). The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cambridge University.
Wayne Proudfoot (1976). Mysticism, the Numinous, and the Moral. Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (1):3 - 28.
Ann Casement & David J. Tacey (eds.) (2006). The Idea of the Numinous: Contemporary Jungian and Psychoanalytic Perspectives. Routledge.
David Bastow (1976). Otto and Numinous Experience. Religious Studies 12 (2):159 - 176.
Owen Ware (2007). Rudolph Otto's Idea of the Holy: A Reappraisal. Heythrop Journal 48 (1):48–60.
Leon Schlamm (1992). Numinous Experience and Religious Language. Religious Studies 28 (4):533 - 551.
Keith E. Yandell (1992). Sensory Experience and Numinous Experience. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 31 (2/3):89 - 117.
Jose Kuruvachira (2004). Religious Experience Buddhist, Christian, and Hindu: A Critical Study of Ninian Smart's Philosophical Interpretation of the Numinous and the Mystical. Intercultural Publications.
Timothy Fuller (2009). Oakeshott on the Character of Religious Experience: Need There Be a Conflict Between Science and Religion? Zygon 44 (1):153-167.
Fred H. Blum (1970). Ethics of Industrial Man: An Empirical Study of Religious Awareness and the Experience of Society. London,Routledge & Kegan Paul.
William James (2004). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Simon & Schuster.
Kelly Bulkley (1991). The Quest for Transformational Experience. Environmental Ethics 13 (2):151-163.
Jacqueline Mariña (2004). Schleiermacher on the Outpourings of the Inner Fire: Experiential Expressivism and Religious Pluralism. Religious Studies 40 (2):125-143.
Gregory M. Nixon (2010). From Panexperientialism to Conscious Experience: The Continuum of Experience. Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research 1 (3):216-233.
Timothy V. Kaufman-Osborn (1993). Teasing Feminist Sense From Experience. Hypatia 8 (2):124 - 144.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads7 ( #188,497 of 1,102,971 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,971 )
How can I increase my downloads?