Dignity and cost-effectiveness: analysing the responsibility for decisions in medical ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (3):152-154 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the operation of a health care system, defining the limits of medical care is the joint responsibility of many parties including clinicians, patients, philosophers and politicians. It is suggested that changes in the potential for prolonging life make it necessary to give doctors guidance which may have to incorporate certain features of utilitarianism, individualism and patient-autonomy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Integrated Approach to Resource Allocation.Louise M. Terry - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (2):171-180.
Cost effectiveness of medical ethics training.C. Currie, J. Green, S. Davies & C. Morgan - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (5):328-328.
Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical?A. Williams - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):7-11.
Death with dignity.P. Allmark - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):255-257.
Dignity and technology.Zbigniew Szawarski - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):243-249.
Costs and End-of-Life Care in the NICU: Lessons for the MICU?John D. Lantos & William L. Meadow - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):194-200.
Impartiality and disability discrimination.Greg Bognar - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
17 (#860,469)

6 months
2 (#1,202,576)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?