Is Marx a Fichtean?
Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (1):93-104 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTom Rockmore (1990). Marx and Perestroika. Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (3):193-206.
Peter Singer (2000). Marx: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Tom Rockmore (1989). From Marx to Kant. The Owl of Minerva 20 (2):216-222.
Michael Taylor (1986). Elster's Marx. Inquiry 29 (1-4):3 – 10.
Arno Wouters (1993). Marx's Embryology of Society. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):149-179.
Norman Levine (2012). Marx's Discourse with Hegel. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tom Rockmore (2000). On Recovering Marx After Marxism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):95-106.
Tom Rockmore (2002). Marx After Marxism: The Philosophy of Karl Marx. Blackwell Publishers.
Tom Rockmore (1995). Fichtean Circularity, Antifoundationalism, and Groundless System. Idealistic Studies 25 (1):107-124.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-12-23Total downloads23 ( #53,790 of 549,011 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,011 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
