American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):373-393 (2007)
|Abstract||Anselm holds that God is simple, eternal, and immutable, and that He creates “necessarily”—He “must” create this world. Avicenna and Averroes made the same claims, and derived as entailments that God neither knows singulars nor interacts with the spatio-temporal universe. I argue that Anselm avoids these unpalatableconsequences by being the first philosopher to adopt, clearly and consciously, a four-dimensionalist understanding of time, in which all of time is genuinely present to divine eternity. This enables him to defend the divine perfections in question, and the claim that God creates “necessarily,” while still maintaining the position that God knows singulars and acts in the physical world—in one, immutable, and eternal act|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alice Ramos (2009). Anselm on Truth. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:183-197.
Brian Leftow (1995). Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation. Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
William Lane Craig (2000). Omniscience, Tensed Facts and Divine Eternity. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Gregory B. Sadler (2006). Mercy and Justice in St. Anselm's Proslogion. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):41-61.
Robert Pasnau (2011). On Existing All at Once. In C. Tapp (ed.), God, Eternity, and Time. Ashgate.
Katherin Rogers (2009). Back to Eternalism. Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.
Katherin A. Rogers (2008). Anselm on Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Delmas Lewis (1988). Eternity, Time and Timelessness. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):72-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,800 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?