The Tree Theory and Isomorphism

Analysis 41 (1):6-11 (1981)
A main thesis of Fred Sommers' type theory, is that an isomorphism exists between any natural language and the categories discriminated by that language. Here the author gives an explanation of what this claim comes to. And then it is argued that, so understood, the claim is incompatible with Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Finally, it is argued against trying to salvage the isomorphism thesis by appealing to some other set theory.
Keywords Sommers  sommers type theory  set theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/41.1.6
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,189
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Charles Sayward (1976). A Defense of Sommers. Philosophical Studies 29 (5):343 - 347.
Charles Sayward (1978). Strawson on Categories. Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (3):83-87.
Colin McLarty (1993). Anti-Foundation and Self-Reference. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1):19 - 28.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

80 ( #59,115 of 1,940,952 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

11 ( #88,226 of 1,940,952 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.