The Tree Theory and Isomorphism

Analysis 41 (1):6-11 (1981)
Abstract
A main thesis of Fred Sommers' type theory, is that an isomorphism exists between any natural language and the categories discriminated by that language. Here the author gives an explanation of what this claim comes to. And then it is argued that, so understood, the claim is incompatible with Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Finally, it is argued against trying to salvage the isomorphism thesis by appealing to some other set theory.
Keywords Sommers  sommers type theory  set theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    Charles Sayward (1976). A Defense of Sommers. Philosophical Studies 29 (5):343 - 347.
    Charles Sayward (1978). Strawson on Categories. Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (3):83-87.
    Colin McLarty (1993). Anti-Foundation and Self-Reference. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1):19 - 28.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-02-23

    Total downloads

    6 ( #162,855 of 1,088,811 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,811 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.