Attentional Capture by Irrelevant Transients Leads to Perceptual Errors in a Competitive Change Detection Task

, &
Frontiers in Psychology 3 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00164

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Anxiety, conscious awareness and change detection.Sally M. Gregory & Anthony Lambert - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):69-79.
Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing.Ronald A. Rensink - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7:345-376.
Better safe than sorry: Simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention.Sarah J. Forbes, Helena M. Purkis & Ottmar V. Lipp - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (5):794-804.
Is a pre-change object representation weakened under correct detection of a change?☆.Yei-Yu Yeh & Cheng-Ta Yang - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):91-102.
Unconsciously learning task-irrelevant perceptual sequences.Xiuyan Guo, Shan Jiang, Hongyi Wang, Lei Zhu, Jinghua Tang, Zoltan Dienes & Zhiliang Yang - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1):203-211.
Priming effects under correct change detection and change blindness.Corrado Caudek & Fulvio Domini - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1):290-305.
Metacognitive errors in change detection: Missing the gap between lab and life.Daniel Smilek, John D. Eastwood, Michael G. Reynolds & Alan Kingstone - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):52-57.
Change blindness blindness: Beliefs about the roles of intention and scene complexity in change detection.Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie Angelone - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):31-51.
The change probability effect: Incidental learning, adaptability, and shared visual working memory resources.Amanda E. van Lamsweerde & Melissa R. Beck - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1676-1689.
Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?James Head & William S. Helton - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):913-919.
Verbal predicates foster conscious recollection but not familiarity of a task-irrelevant perceptual feature – An ERP study.Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Anna M. Arend, Kirstin Bergström & Hubert D. Zimmer - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (3):679-689.
Drunk, but not blind: The effects of alcohol intoxication on change blindness.Gregory Jh Colflesh & Jennifer Wiley - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1):231-236.
Subjective discriminability of invisibility: A framework for distinguishing perceptual and attentional failures of awareness.Ryota Kanai, Vincent Walsh & Chia-Huei Tseng - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1045-1057.
Perceptual attenuation of an irrelevant auditory verbal input as measured by an involuntary verbal response in a selective-attention task.Tamar Zelniker - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (1):52.
Implicit learning for probable changes in a visual change detection task.Melissa R. Beck, Bonnie L. Angelone, Daniel T. Levin, Matthew S. Peterson & D. Alexander Varakin - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1192-1208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
24 (#676,707)

6 months
10 (#308,281)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.R. Desimone & J. Duncan - 1995 - Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1):193-222.
A framework for consciousness.Francis Crick & Christof Koch - 2003 - Nature Neuroscience 6:119-26.
Why visual attention and awareness are different.Victor A. F. Lamme - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):12-18.
Change blindness.Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin - 1997 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):241-82.

View all 11 references / Add more references