Form and content in empirical science

Philosophy of Science 18 (3):223-229 (1951)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers investigating the nature of knowledge from Bacon and Descartes to logical empiricism, have sought to understand its character by means of the distinction between the content of knowledge, and the abstract logical and mathematical principles which regulate its structure or form. The nature of the distinction, the relative roles of content and form, and the relationships between the two, however, have been given widely divergent interpretations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

(Kivy on) the form–content identity thesis.Kelly Dean Jolley - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):193-204.
A Structural Description of Evolutionary Theory.Robert N. Brandon - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:427 - 439.
Empirical content and rational constraint.Cheryl K. Chen - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):242 – 264.
McDowell’s Kantianism.John Macfarlane - 2004 - Theoria 70 (2-3):250-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#358,680)

6 months
8 (#351,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references