Ambivalent attitudes towards technical progress and steps to overcome them: Reflections and results of an empirical investigation [Book Review]

AI and Society 6 (3):232-244 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Bremen research group (the psychologists Birgit Volmerg and Thomas Leithäuser and the social scientist Eva Senghaas-Knobloch) was concerned with investigation into criteria for social compatibility in the area of information and communication technology, as well as with the perspectives for action in different occupational situations experienced by engineers. One central problem that remained unresolved during discussions with nine groups of engineers was the relationship between economy and culture. Only within the context of a cooperative cost-benefit or means-and-ends discussion (in which all groups in society participate) are problem-conscious engineers able to utilise their professional responsibility in the sense of achieving socially responsible technological development

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

About the sense of social compatibility.Karin Bohmann - 1989 - AI and Society 3 (4):323-331.
Professional responsibility: The role of the engineer in society.Steven P. Nichols - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):327-337.
The Nazi Engineers: Reflections on Technological Ethics in Hell.Eric Katz - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):571-582.
The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics.Charles E. Harris - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):153-164.
Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers' Ethics.Josep M. Basart & Montse Serra - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):179-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-20

Downloads
23 (#677,865)

6 months
4 (#776,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?