Theories of Violence and the Explanation of Ultra-violent Behavior
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In T. Levin (ed.), Violence: Mercurial Gestalt (2008)
Theorists in various scientific disciplines offer radically different accounts of the origin of violent behavior in humans, but it is not clear how the study of violence is to be scientifically grounded. This problem is made more complicated because both what sorts of acts constitute violence and what needs to be appealed to in explaining violence differs according to social scientists, biologists, anthropologists and neurophysiologists, and this generates serious problems with respect to even attempting to ascertain the differential bona fides of these various explanatory programs. As a consequence, there is little theoretical reason to suspect that efforts to prevent violence will have any appreciable effect. In this paper we investigate the general issue of whether any of the general theoretical approaches to violent behavior can reasonably be taken to be the best approach to the explanation of seriously violent behavior. Our more specific aim is to examine the controversial explanation of violent behavior offered by Lonnie Athens in order to ascertain whether it can be seriously considered to be the best explanation of violent behavior.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David I. Waddington (2007). Locating the Wrongness in Ultra-Violent Video Games. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):121-128.
P. Kyle Stanford (forthcoming). Underdetermination. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Meda Chesney-Lind (1999). Contextualizing Women's Violence and Aggression: Beyond Denial and Demonization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):222-223.
Alessandro Salice (2014). Violence as a Social Fact. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (1):161-177.
Jacqui Poltera (2011). Violence and Silencing: A Philosophical Investigation of Apartheid. Critical Horizons 12 (2):232-250.
Elena Del Rio (2012). Samuel Fuller's Schizo-Violent Cinema and the Affective Politics of War. Deleuze Studies 6 (3):438-463.
Stephen C. Maxson (1999). Some Reflections on Sex Differences in Aggression and Violence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):232-233.
Tobias Roehl & Herbert Kalthoff (2013). Remarks on Violence and Intersubjectivity. Human Studies 36 (1):111-119.
Gwen Adshead (2011). Same but Different: Constructions of Female Violence in Forensic Mental Health. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (1):41-68.
Kenneth Corvo, Donald Dutton & Wan-Yi Chen (2009). Do Duluth Model Interventions with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence Violate Mental Health Professional Ethics? Ethics and Behavior 19 (4):323 – 340.
Wan-Yi Chen, Donald Dutton & Kenneth Corvo (2009). Do Duluth Model Interventions With Perpetrators of Domestic Violence Violate Mental Health Professional Ethics? Ethics and Behavior 19 (4):323-340.
Kimberly Hutchings (2007). Simone de Beauvoir and the Ambiguous Ethics of Political Violence. Hypatia 22 (3):111-132.
Moya Lloyd (2013). Heteronormativity and/as Violence: The “Sexing” of Gwen Araujo. Hypatia 28 (4):818-834.
Elizabeth Sparks (1994). Human Rights Violations in the Inner City: Implications for Moral Educators. Journal of Moral Education 23 (3):315-332.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-22
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?