Hypotheses in 19th Century British Philosophy of Science: Herschel, Whewell, Mill

In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter. pp. 59-76 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9783110210620.59

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sherlock Holmes and probabilistic induction.Soshichi Uchii - unknown
Sir John F. W. Herschel and Charles Darwin: Nineteenth-Century Science and Its Methodology.Charles H. Pence - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):108-140.
Mill's System of Logic.David Godden - 2014 - In W. J. Mander (ed.), Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the nineteenth century. Oxford University Press. pp. 44-70.
Whewell and the Scientists: Science and Philosophy of Science in 19th Century Britain.Laura Snyder - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:81-94.
Reforming philosophy: a Victorian debate on science and society.Laura J. Snyder - 2006 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Whewell and mill on induction.Harold T. Walsh - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
History of Science a la Belle Lettre: a Case of Laura Snyder. [REVIEW]И.Т Касавин - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):233-237.
History of Science a la Belle Lettre: a Case of Laura Snyder. [REVIEW]Ilya Kasavin - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):233-237.
William Whewell on the Consilience of Inductions.Larry Laudan - 1971 - The Monist 55 (3):368-391.
History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate.Aaron D. Cobb - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.
John Stuart mill on induction and hypotheses.Struan Jacobs - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):69-83.
The Method and Induction: William Whewell and Current Philosophy of Science.Laura Joy Snyder - 1996 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
William Whewell's Theory of Scientific Method.Robert E. Butts (ed.) - 1969 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
The Reception of Positivism in Whewell, Mill and Brentano.Arnaud Dewalque - 2022 - In Ion Tanasescu, Alexandru Bejinariu, Susan Krantz Gabriel & Constantin Stoenescu (eds.), Brentano and the Positive Philosophy of Comte and Mill: With Translations of Original Writings on Philosophy as Science by Franz Brentano. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Whewell's Critics: Have They Prevented Him from Doing Good?John Wettersten - 2005 - Rodopi.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
11 (#1,129,170)

6 months
4 (#779,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura J. Snyder
Johns Hopkins University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references